Malware Devil

Friday, July 9, 2021

Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP

Emerging technologies are shaping the future of every industry. Whether that’s through Artificial Intelligence and robotics transforming the way humans interact with the world, or ever-evolving “things” that are being embedded with sensors and software (hello, Alexa and Google Home) that strive to make every aspect of your life “smart”. Technology moves so fast that it’s vital for product leaders to have their fingers on the pulse of various emerging technologies and their potential impact. These technologies support market expansion, allow better differentiation of products and services, and enable providers to be more competitive and efficient.

One of the ways CyberSaint uses emerging technologies is through Natural Language Processing (NLP). NLP’s ultimate objective is to “read,” decipher, and understand language that’s valuable to the end-user. Currently, there are several ways NLP is used in day-to-day life. Many are familiar with chatbots, or auto-complete in emails or texts. But there’s a gap in cybersecurity and integrated risk management where NLP could be used to inform risk and regulatory compliance. Since interactions between humans and machines are based on language processing, NLP allows organizations to process increasingly large amounts of data, granting them the ability to be more efficient, more risk cognizant, and more secure.

The post Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/why-now-how-cybersaint-is-making-automated-risk-assessments-possible-with-nlp-4/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-now-how-cybersaint-is-making-automated-risk-assessments-possible-with-nlp-4

Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP

Emerging technologies are shaping the future of every industry. Whether that’s through Artificial Intelligence and robotics transforming the way humans interact with the world, or ever-evolving “things” that are being embedded with sensors and software (hello, Alexa and Google Home) that strive to make every aspect of your life “smart”. Technology moves so fast that it’s vital for product leaders to have their fingers on the pulse of various emerging technologies and their potential impact. These technologies support market expansion, allow better differentiation of products and services, and enable providers to be more competitive and efficient.

One of the ways CyberSaint uses emerging technologies is through Natural Language Processing (NLP). NLP’s ultimate objective is to “read,” decipher, and understand language that’s valuable to the end-user. Currently, there are several ways NLP is used in day-to-day life. Many are familiar with chatbots, or auto-complete in emails or texts. But there’s a gap in cybersecurity and integrated risk management where NLP could be used to inform risk and regulatory compliance. Since interactions between humans and machines are based on language processing, NLP allows organizations to process increasingly large amounts of data, granting them the ability to be more efficient, more risk cognizant, and more secure.

The post Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/why-now-how-cybersaint-is-making-automated-risk-assessments-possible-with-nlp-3/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-now-how-cybersaint-is-making-automated-risk-assessments-possible-with-nlp-3

Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP

Emerging technologies are shaping the future of every industry. Whether that’s through Artificial Intelligence and robotics transforming the way humans interact with the world, or ever-evolving “things” that are being embedded with sensors and software (hello, Alexa and Google Home) that strive to make every aspect of your life “smart”. Technology moves so fast that it’s vital for product leaders to have their fingers on the pulse of various emerging technologies and their potential impact. These technologies support market expansion, allow better differentiation of products and services, and enable providers to be more competitive and efficient.

One of the ways CyberSaint uses emerging technologies is through Natural Language Processing (NLP). NLP’s ultimate objective is to “read,” decipher, and understand language that’s valuable to the end-user. Currently, there are several ways NLP is used in day-to-day life. Many are familiar with chatbots, or auto-complete in emails or texts. But there’s a gap in cybersecurity and integrated risk management where NLP could be used to inform risk and regulatory compliance. Since interactions between humans and machines are based on language processing, NLP allows organizations to process increasingly large amounts of data, granting them the ability to be more efficient, more risk cognizant, and more secure.

The post Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/why-now-how-cybersaint-is-making-automated-risk-assessments-possible-with-nlp-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-now-how-cybersaint-is-making-automated-risk-assessments-possible-with-nlp-2

Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP

Emerging technologies are shaping the future of every industry. Whether that’s through Artificial Intelligence and robotics transforming the way humans interact with the world, or ever-evolving “things” that are being embedded with sensors and software (hello, Alexa and Google Home) that strive to make every aspect of your life “smart”. Technology moves so fast that it’s vital for product leaders to have their fingers on the pulse of various emerging technologies and their potential impact. These technologies support market expansion, allow better differentiation of products and services, and enable providers to be more competitive and efficient.

One of the ways CyberSaint uses emerging technologies is through Natural Language Processing (NLP). NLP’s ultimate objective is to “read,” decipher, and understand language that’s valuable to the end-user. Currently, there are several ways NLP is used in day-to-day life. Many are familiar with chatbots, or auto-complete in emails or texts. But there’s a gap in cybersecurity and integrated risk management where NLP could be used to inform risk and regulatory compliance. Since interactions between humans and machines are based on language processing, NLP allows organizations to process increasingly large amounts of data, granting them the ability to be more efficient, more risk cognizant, and more secure.

The post Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Why Now: How CyberSaint is Making Automated Risk Assessments Possible with NLP appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/why-now-how-cybersaint-is-making-automated-risk-assessments-possible-with-nlp/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-now-how-cybersaint-is-making-automated-risk-assessments-possible-with-nlp

Kyverno vs. OPA: Modernizing Your Kubernetes Policy Management by Ritesh Patel

Ever since Kubernetes emerged as a top-contender for multi-cloud container management, automation and security challenges have been holding back the adoption of this innovative solution. This is sparking a new revolutionary technology: Kubernetes policy management engines. These policy engines allow for the automation and secure handling of Kubernetes configurations — essentially restricting what applications can run within a given cluster.

A few years ago, the best way to manage security within Kubernetes systems was through the use of Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). However, RBACs were unable to provide adequate oversight at the level of specific resources, meaning intervention at higher levels is not possible. Pod Security Policies (PSPs) were designed as a built-in solution to provide cluster-level security. PSPs enable fine-grained control over the authorization and update of different pods. Unfortunately, the decision has been made to deprecate the use of PSPs due to complexities in the understanding and configuration of these policies.

Currently, the consensus on how to properly manage Kubernetes policy comes down to one debate: Kyverno vs. OPA. Both Kubernetes policy management engines are developed to help enforce management policy across stacks; however, they have some significant differences. For C-suite executives and high-end stakeholders to make informed decisions, it’s important to understand exactly what you’ll get from Kyverno vs. OPA.

But before we get to that debate, let’s go over the exact function of a Kubernetes policy management engine.

Kubernetes and Policy Management

As enterprise companies continue to adopt hybrid- and multi-cloud systems, there is an increasing need to manage the different containers that are being used to house various components of their digital infrastructure. This management system needs to operate across public and private clouds, centralized servers, and other critical infrastructures. This is where Kubernetes comes into the picture.

Kubernetes uses declarative programming to understand, compare, and modify any discrepancies between a container’s observable and desired states. Essentially, it ensures that all programs are running according to a user’s preferred policies and, if they aren’t, can rectify issues through internal logic.

But as these systems continue to increase in complexity, a higher-order solution is needed to manage all of the Kubernetes policies enacted across the multi-cloud infrastructure. This need resulted in the development of two distinct policy engines that can be leveraged to manage policies in a Kubernetes environment. The first, OPA/Gatekeeper, is a general system that operates independently of applications to manage their policy decisions through a specialized programming language. Kyverno, on the other hand, was created specifically to manage Kubernetes policies and is written in an easy-to-use native language.

Open Policy Agent

OPA is a general policy engine that can be leveraged across Kubernetes, Envoy, and other container environments. OPA was initially developed as an engine applicable for systems outside the realm of Kubernetes and then adapted to include the container management system upon its development. Gatekeeper is the specific webhook built on the OPA project used to manage policies in Kubernetes environments.

By decoupling policy management from the domain of specific codes, each software can be specified in a declarative way, and decisions offloaded from the individual systems themselves. The OPA/Gatekeeper engine allows for the validation and mutation of different resources. Each policy decision begins with a request, known as a query, which OPA processes through a specific declarative language known as Rego.

While incredibly well-suited for application across any container management system, the custom Rego language is not Kubernetes-native. This means all relevant DevOps teams will need to invest additional time and resources to gain proficiency in a new programming language before they can apply OPA Gatekeeper for Kubernetes policy management.

Kyverno

The younger of the two police management engines, Kyverno, has been developed as an answer to the highly complex, overly demanding nature of OPA Gatekeeper. Originally developed by Nirmata and now part of CNCF sandbox projects, this Kubernetes policy engine provides DevOps departments with a host of benefits — from its Kubernetes-native design to its ability to generate policies.

In response to the complex task of learning the OPA’s Rego language, Kyverno is designed specifically to use Kubernetes-style composition. This means that its policy expression capabilities provide users with a higher degree of simplicity and flexibility while enabling the development of more powerful policies. This Kubernetes-native design also makes Kyverno highly compatible with the dynamic configuration, GitOps, and tools commonly applied in a Kubernetes environment.

Policy engines are created with key capabilities that enable them to validate and mutate policies as needed. Kyverno, in addition to the validation and mutation functions that OPA Gatekeeper performs, also has built-in generation capabilities. Generation rules allow for supplementary and supporting resources every time a resource is updated or created.

Kyverno vs OPA: The Decision

At the end of the day, the decision regarding how best to modernize your Kubernetes policy management will come down to the specific criteria of your enterprise operations. For digital infrastructures comprising multiple different DevOps teams that require the development of complex policies, OPA Gatekeeper may be the right solution. But for any company that is singularly dedicated to the use of Kubernetes for their container management needs, Kyverno is unparalleled in its ability to modernize policy management processes. As it currently stands, CIOs leveraging Kubernetes as their predominant container management solutions can benefit greatly from the application of Kyverno as their policy management engine.

About the Author

Ritesh Patel

Ritesh Patel is the Co-Founder at Nirmata, a cloud computing company responsible for Kyverno and other Kubernetes policy management solutions. While Ritesh has spent decades in the tech industry, his experience covers a wide range of roles and responsibilities, including software engineering, market strategy, and business development.

 

 

 

 

 

The post Kyverno vs. OPA: Modernizing Your Kubernetes Policy Management by Ritesh Patel appeared first on Hakin9 – IT Security Magazine.

Read More

The post Kyverno vs. OPA: Modernizing Your Kubernetes Policy Management by Ritesh Patel appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/kyverno-vs-opa-modernizing-your-kubernetes-policy-management-by-ritesh-patel/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=kyverno-vs-opa-modernizing-your-kubernetes-policy-management-by-ritesh-patel

Notes from Our CISO on the Kaseya Ransomware Attack

JumpCloud’s CISO discusses ramifications and takeaways of REvil’s supply-chain ransomware attack on Kaseya.

The post Notes from Our CISO on the Kaseya Ransomware Attack appeared first on JumpCloud.

The post Notes from Our CISO on the Kaseya Ransomware Attack appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Notes from Our CISO on the Kaseya Ransomware Attack appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/notes-from-our-ciso-on-the-kaseya-ransomware-attack/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=notes-from-our-ciso-on-the-kaseya-ransomware-attack

What is Session Hijacking and How Do You Prevent It?

Logging into websites or portals are part of many people’s daily routines. Unfortunately, there is a constant threat of session hijacking looming. Find out what can be done to prevent it.

The post What is Session Hijacking and How Do You Prevent It? appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post What is Session Hijacking and How Do You Prevent It? appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/what-is-session-hijacking-and-how-do-you-prevent-it/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=what-is-session-hijacking-and-how-do-you-prevent-it

Kaseya And PrintNightmare Vulnerabilities | Avast

“It never rains but it pours.” It’s the saying that describes situations in which several bad things happen at once, and these situations are ones that security incident teams know well. In fact, security teams across the globe have quite recently been experiencing such a situation in regards to the active, formidable PrintNightmare and Kaseya threats.

The post Kaseya And PrintNightmare Vulnerabilities | Avast appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Kaseya And PrintNightmare Vulnerabilities | Avast appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/kaseya-and-printnightmare-vulnerabilities-avast/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=kaseya-and-printnightmare-vulnerabilities-avast

Lazarus Targets Job-Seeking Engineers with Malicious Documents

Notorious North Korean APT impersonates Airbus, General Motors and Rheinmetall to lure potential victims into downloading malware.
Read More

The post Lazarus Targets Job-Seeking Engineers with Malicious Documents appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/lazarus-targets-job-seeking-engineers-with-malicious-documents/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lazarus-targets-job-seeking-engineers-with-malicious-documents

Kaseya VST supply-chain attack – Week in security with Tony Anscombe

Post Content

The post Kaseya VST supply-chain attack – Week in security with Tony Anscombe appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/kaseya-vst-supply-chain-attack-week-in-security-with-tony-anscombe/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=kaseya-vst-supply-chain-attack-week-in-security-with-tony-anscombe

Ask Chloé: Career Advancement

Welcome to the Ask Chloé column on Security Boulevard! Each week, Chloé provides advice to readers’ questions to help guide them as they navigate the technology industry. This week, Chloé helps a reader who’s between jobs and looking to keep their skills sharp while gaining knowledge and expertise.   Dear Chloé, I’m currently between jobs..

The post Ask Chloé: Career Advancement appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Ask Chloé: Career Advancement appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/ask-chloe-career-advancement/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ask-chloe-career-advancement

Digital Habits During Pandemic Have Lasting Impact

The unexpected global pandemic left the world scrambling to maintain their daily activities and work as best they could. With stay-at-home orders that lasted for months on end—and some countries currently instituting another wave of lockdowns—most people resorted to consuming services and ordering goods online, encompassing everything from groceries to telemedicine and shifting work models..

The post Digital Habits During Pandemic Have Lasting Impact appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Digital Habits During Pandemic Have Lasting Impact appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/digital-habits-during-pandemic-have-lasting-impact/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=digital-habits-during-pandemic-have-lasting-impact

Reevaluating Your Breach Prevention Strategy

Do you deploy security products to protect your organization against data breaches as part of your infrastructure cybersecurity strategy? If so, it’s important to ensure there are no critical gaps in your security stack. If you consider the category of breach protection critical, you should shift from a product-oriented to a protection-oriented mindset. This all..

The post Reevaluating Your Breach Prevention Strategy appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Reevaluating Your Breach Prevention Strategy appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/reevaluating-your-breach-prevention-strategy/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=reevaluating-your-breach-prevention-strategy

Twitter Considers New Security Features | Avast

Twitter People Experience Designer Lena Emara tweeted 4 new Twitter security feature concepts, asking users for feedback on whether or not they should move into development. “Privacy is one of those things everyone wants, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all,” Emara tweeted, before going into detail on each idea. The first idea, “Replies,” gives users an easy way to make their tweets public if they’d like to make a response to a non-follower viewable. The second idea, “Account Breadcrumbs,” provides easy and quick switching between multiple profiles. “Privacy Sets,” allows users to pick from various security presets, depending on their needs. The final idea, “Discover Me (Or Not),” alerts users when someone searches their username. It also lets users choose whether or not they’d like to be found that way. “These are just ideas and not being built (yet), so your feedback is helpful!” Emara wrote.

The post Twitter Considers New Security Features | Avast appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post Twitter Considers New Security Features | Avast appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/twitter-considers-new-security-features-avast/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=twitter-considers-new-security-features-avast

What the Van Buren Case Means For Security Researchers

The federal computer crime law prohibits “computer trespass.” This includes both “accessing” a computer without authorization, and “exceeding the scope of authorization” to access a computer. If these terms seem vague and ambiguous to you, well, welcome to the club. In June of 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court attempted to more clearly define what constitutes..

The post What the Van Buren Case Means For Security Researchers appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Read More

The post What the Van Buren Case Means For Security Researchers appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/what-the-van-buren-case-means-for-security-researchers/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=what-the-van-buren-case-means-for-security-researchers

Vulnerabilities in Cisco Products (CERT-EU Security Advisory 2021-034)

On July 7, Cisco released security updates to address several security vulnerabilities. This list includes vulnerabilities rated High affecting Cisco Business Process Automation (BPA) with a CVSS score of 8.8 out of 10 and a vulnerability rated Medium affecting Cisco Adaptive Security Device Manager (ASDM) with a CVSS score of 7.5 out of 10.
Vulnerabilities in Cisco Business Process Automation (BPA) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges to Administrator. The vulnerability affecting Cisco Adaptive Security Device Manager (ASDM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on a user’s operating system.
Read More

The post Vulnerabilities in Cisco Products (CERT-EU Security Advisory 2021-034) appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/vulnerabilities-in-cisco-products-cert-eu-security-advisory-2021-034/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=vulnerabilities-in-cisco-products-cert-eu-security-advisory-2021-034

ISC Stormcast For Friday, July 9th, 2021 https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=7578, (Fri, Jul 9th)

(c) SANS Internet Storm Center. https://isc.sans.edu Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. Read More

The post ISC Stormcast For Friday, July 9th, 2021 https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=7578, (Fri, Jul 9th) appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/isc-stormcast-for-friday-july-9th-2021-https-isc-sans-edu-podcastdetail-htmlid7578-fri-jul-9th/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=isc-stormcast-for-friday-july-9th-2021-https-isc-sans-edu-podcastdetail-htmlid7578-fri-jul-9th

Network Security News Summary for Friday July 9th, 2021

Post Content

The post Network Security News Summary for Friday July 9th, 2021 appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/network-security-news-summary-for-friday-july-9th-2021/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=network-security-news-summary-for-friday-july-9th-2021

ESB-2021.2344 – [Appliance] MDT AutoSave: Multiple vulnerabilities

—–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–
Hash: SHA256

===========================================================================
AUSCERT External Security Bulletin Redistribution

ESB-2021.2344
Advisory (icsa-21-189-02) MDT AutoSave
9 July 2021

===========================================================================

AusCERT Security Bulletin Summary
———————————

Product: MDT AutoSave
Publisher: ICS-CERT
Operating System: Network Appliance
Impact/Access: Execute Arbitrary Code/Commands — Remote/Unauthenticated
Overwrite Arbitrary Files — Remote/Unauthenticated
Create Arbitrary Files — Remote/Unauthenticated
Access Confidential Data — Remote/Unauthenticated
Unauthorised Access — Remote/Unauthenticated
Reduced Security — Remote/Unauthenticated
Resolution: Patch/Upgrade
CVE Names: CVE-2021-32961 CVE-2021-32957 CVE-2021-32953
CVE-2021-32949 CVE-2021-32945 CVE-2021-32937
CVE-2021-32933

Original Bulletin:
https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-21-189-02

– ————————–BEGIN INCLUDED TEXT——————–

ICS Advisory (ICSA-21-189-02)

MDT AutoSave

Original release date: July 08, 2021

Legal Notice

All information products included in https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics are provided
“as is” for informational purposes only. The Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information
contained within. DHS does not endorse any commercial product or service,
referenced in this product or otherwise. Further dissemination of this product
is governed by the Traffic Light Protocol (TLP) marking in the header. For more
information about TLP, see https://us-cert.cisa.gov/tlp/ .

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

o CVSS v3 10.0
o ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity
o Vendor: MDT Software
o Equipment: MDT AutoSave
o Vulnerabilities: Inadequate Encryption Strength, SQL Injection, Relative
Path Traversal, Command Injection, Uncontrolled Search Path Element,
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information, Unrestricted
Upload of File with Dangerous Type

2. RISK EVALUATION

Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities by an attacker with detailed
understanding of the product architecture and database structure could lead to
full remote execution on the Remote MDT Server without an existing user or
password.

3. TECHNICAL DETAILS

3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS

MDT Software reports the vulnerabilities affect the following MDT Autosave
products:

o MDT AutoSave versions prior to v6.02.06
o MDT AutoSave v7.00-7.04
o AutoSave for System Platform (A4SP) versions prior to 4.01
o A4SP Version 5.00

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW

3.2.1 INADEQUATE ENCRYPTION STRENGTH CWE-326

An attacker could decipher the encryption and gain access to the system.

CVE-2021-32945 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of
7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is ( AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/
C:H/I:N/A:N ).

3.2.2 SQL INJECTION CWE-89

An attacker could utilize SQL commands to create a new user in the system and
update the user’s permissions, granting the attacker the ability to login.

CVE-2021-32953 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of
9.8 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is ( AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/
C:H/I:H/A:H) .

3.2.3 RELATIVE PATH TRAVERSAL CWE-23

An attacker could utilize a function that permits changing a designated path to
another path and traversing the directory, allowing the replacement of an
existing file with a malicious file.

CVE-2021-32949 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of
7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is ( AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/
C:N/I:H/A:N ).

3.2.4 COMMAND INJECTION CWE-77

An attacker could leverage an API to pass along a malicious file that could
then manipulate the process creation command line and run a command line
argument. This could then be leveraged to run a malicious process.

CVE-2021-32933 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of
10.0 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is ( AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/
C:H/I:H/A:H ).

3.2.5 UNCONTROLLED SEARCH PATH ELEMENT CWE-427

A function is used to retrieve system information for a specific process, and
this information collection executes multiple commands and summarizes the
information into an XML. This function and subsequent process gives full path
to the executable and is therefore vulnerable to binary hijacking.

CVE-2021-32957 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of
7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is ( AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/
C:N/I:H/A:N ).

3.2.6 GENERATION OF ERROR MESSAGE CONTAINING SENSITIVE INFORMATION CWE-209

An attacker can gain knowledge of a session temporary working folder where the
getfile and putfile commands are used. An attacker can leverage this knowledge
to provide a malicious command to the working directory where the read and
write activity can be initiated.

CVE-2021-32937 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of
7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is ( AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/
C:H/I:N/A:N ).

3.2.7 UNRESTRICTED UPLOAD OF FILE WITH DANGEROUS TYPE CWE-434

A getfile function enables a user to supply an optional parameter, resulting in
the processing of a request in a special manner. This can result in the
execution of an unzip command and place a malicious .exe file in one of the
locations the function looks for and get execution capabilities.

CVE-2021-32961 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of
7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is ( AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/
C:N/I:H/A:N ).

3.3 BACKGROUND

o CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Chemical, Critical Manufacturing, Energy,
Food and Agriculture, Healthcare and Public Health, Water and Wastewater
Systems
o COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
o COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: United States

3.4 RESEARCHER

Amir Preminger of Claroty Research reported these vulnerabilities to MDT
Software.

4. MITIGATIONS

Updated versions of MDT AutoSave and AutoSave for System Platform (A4SP) were
developed to address these vulnerabilities as follows:

o MDT AutoSave 6.x version: Version 6.02.06 (Released January 2021)
o MDT AutoSave 7.x version: Version 7.05 (Released December 2020)
o A4SP 4.x version: Version 4.01 (Released June 2021)
o A4SP 5.x version: Version 5.01 (Released May 2021)

For more information about these vulnerabilities, and to obtain and install the
new versions, please contact MDT Software customer support .

CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of
exploitation of this vulnerability. Specifically, users should:

o Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems,
and ensure that they are not accessible from the Internet .
o Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls, and
isolate them from the business network.
o When remote access is required, use secure methods, such as Virtual Private
Networks (VPNs), recognizing that VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should
be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize that VPN
is only as secure as the connected devices.

CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk
assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.

CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices
on the ICS webpage on us-cert.cisa.gov . Several recommended practices are
available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control
Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies .

Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available
on the ICS webpage on us-cert.cisa.gov in the Technical Information Paper,
ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation
Strategies .

Organizations observing any suspected malicious activity should follow their
established internal procedures and report their findings to CISA for tracking
and correlation against other incidents.

CISA also recommends users take the following measures to protect themselves
from social engineering attacks:

o Do not click web links or open unsolicited attachments in email messages.
o Refer to Recognizing and Avoiding Email Scams for more information on
avoiding email scams.
o Refer to Avoiding Social Engineering and Phishing Attacks for more
information on social engineering attacks.

No known public exploits specifically target these vulnerabilities.

For any questions related to this report, please contact the CISA at:

Email: CISAservicedesk@cisa.dhs.gov
Toll Free: 1-888-282-0870

CISA continuously strives to improve its products and services. You can help by
choosing one of the links below to provide feedback about this product.

– ————————–END INCLUDED TEXT——————–

You have received this e-mail bulletin as a result of your organisation’s
registration with AusCERT. The mailing list you are subscribed to is
maintained within your organisation, so if you do not wish to continue
receiving these bulletins you should contact your local IT manager. If
you do not know who that is, please send an email to auscert@auscert.org.au
and we will forward your request to the appropriate person.

NOTE: Third Party Rights
This security bulletin is provided as a service to AusCERT’s members. As
AusCERT did not write the document quoted above, AusCERT has had no control
over its content. The decision to follow or act on information or advice
contained in this security bulletin is the responsibility of each user or
organisation, and should be considered in accordance with your organisation’s
site policies and procedures. AusCERT takes no responsibility for consequences
which may arise from following or acting on information or advice contained in
this security bulletin.

NOTE: This is only the original release of the security bulletin. It may
not be updated when updates to the original are made. If downloading at
a later date, it is recommended that the bulletin is retrieved directly
from the author’s website to ensure that the information is still current.

Contact information for the authors of the original document is included
in the Security Bulletin above. If you have any questions or need further
information, please contact them directly.

Previous advisories and external security bulletins can be retrieved from:

https://www.auscert.org.au/bulletins/

===========================================================================
Australian Computer Emergency Response Team
The University of Queensland
Brisbane
Qld 4072

Internet Email: auscert@auscert.org.au
Facsimile: (07) 3365 7031
Telephone: (07) 3365 4417 (International: +61 7 3365 4417)
AusCERT personnel answer during Queensland business hours
which are GMT+10:00 (AEST).
On call after hours for member emergencies only.
===========================================================================
—–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—–
Comment: http://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=1967
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=QhDX
—–END PGP SIGNATURE—–

Read More

The post ESB-2021.2344 – [Appliance] MDT AutoSave: Multiple vulnerabilities appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/esb-2021-2344-appliance-mdt-autosave-multiple-vulnerabilities/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=esb-2021-2344-appliance-mdt-autosave-multiple-vulnerabilities

ESB-2021.2345 – [Appliance] Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100: Denial of service – Remote/unauthenticated

—–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–
Hash: SHA256

===========================================================================
AUSCERT External Security Bulletin Redistribution

ESB-2021.2345
Advisory (icsa-21-189-01) Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100
9 July 2021

===========================================================================

AusCERT Security Bulletin Summary
———————————

Product: Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100
Publisher: ICS-CERT
Operating System: Network Appliance
Impact/Access: Denial of Service — Remote/Unauthenticated
Resolution: Mitigation
CVE Names: CVE-2021-33012

Original Bulletin:
https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-21-189-01

– ————————–BEGIN INCLUDED TEXT——————–

ICS Advisory (ICSA-21-189-01)

Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100

Original release date: July 08, 2021

Legal Notice

All information products included in https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics are provided
“as is” for informational purposes only. The Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information
contained within. DHS does not endorse any commercial product or service,
referenced in this product or otherwise. Further dissemination of this product
is governed by the Traffic Light Protocol (TLP) marking in the header. For more
information about TLP, see https://us-cert.cisa.gov/tlp/ .

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

o CVSS v3 8.6
o ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity
o Vendor: Rockwell Automation
o Equipment: MicroLogix 1100
o Vulnerability: Improper Input Validation

2. RISK EVALUATION

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to create
a denial-of-service condition.

3. TECHNICAL DETAILS

3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS

Rockwell Automation reports the vulnerability affects the following products:

o MicroLogix 1100: All versions

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW

3.2.1 IMPROPER INPUT VALIDATION CWE-20

A remote, unauthenticated attacker sending specially crafted commands could
cause the PLC to fault when the controller is switched to RUN mode, which
results in a denial-of-service condition. If successfully exploited, this
vulnerability will cause the controller to fault when the controller is
switched to RUN mode.

CVE-2021-33012 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of
8.6 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is ( AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/
C:N/I:N/A:H ).

3.3 BACKGROUND

o CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Chemical, Critical Manufacturing, Food and
Agriculture, Water and Wastewater Systems
o COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
o COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: United States

3.4 RESEARCHER

Beau Taub of Bayshore Networks reported this vulnerability to Rockwell
Automation.

4. MITIGATIONS

A controller in this fault state can be recovered by downloading a new project
or an offline copy of the project to the controller. Rockwell Automation
recommends users set the controller switch to RUN mode to prevent remote
programming. Users are encouraged to have a backup copy of the project in the
case it is necessary to recover from an event. Rockwell Automation also
recommends users should consider migrating to the Micro870 controller.

Rockwell automation recommends the following general security guidelines:

o Utilize proper network infrastructure controls, such as firewalls, to help
ensure EtherNet/IP traffic from unauthorized sources are blocked.
o Consult the product documentation for specific features, such as a hardware
mode switch setting, to which may be used to block unauthorized changes,
etc.
o Block all traffic to EtherNet/IP or other CIP protocol-based devices from
outside the Manufacturing Zone by blocking or restricting access to TCP and
UDP Port 2222 and Port 44818 using proper network infrastructure controls,
such as firewalls, UTM devices, or other security appliances. For more
information on TCP/UDP ports used by Rockwell Automation Products, see
Knowledge Base Article BF7490
o Use trusted software, software patches, antivirus/antimalware programs and
interact only with trusted websites and attachments.
o Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems and
ensure they are not accessible from the Internet. For further information
about the risks of unprotected Internet accessible control systems, please
see Knowledgebase Article PN715
o Locate control system networks and devices behind firewalls and isolate
them from the business network.
o When remote access is required, use secure methods, such as virtual private
networks (VPNs), recognizing that VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should
be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize that VPN
is only as secure as the connected devices.

Rockwell Automation users can refer to the Converged Plantwide Ethernet (CPwE)
Design and Implementation Guide for best practices for deploying network
segmentation and broader defense in depth strategies. Users can also refer to
the Rockwell Automation System Security Design Guidelines on how to use
Rockwell Automation products to improve the security of their industrial
automation systems.

For more information see Rockwell Automation’s Security advisory (Login
required).

CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk
assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.

CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices
on the ICS webpage on us-cert.cisa.gov . Several recommended practices are
available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control
Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies .

Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available
on the ICS webpage on us-cert.cisa.gov in the Technical Information Paper,
ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation
Strategies .

Organizations observing any suspected malicious activity should follow their
established internal procedures and report their findings to CISA for tracking
and correlation against other incidents.

No known public exploits specifically target this vulnerability.

For any questions related to this report, please contact the CISA at:

Email: CISAservicedesk@cisa.dhs.gov
Toll Free: 1-888-282-0870

CISA continuously strives to improve its products and services. You can help by
choosing one of the links below to provide feedback about this product.

– ————————–END INCLUDED TEXT——————–

You have received this e-mail bulletin as a result of your organisation’s
registration with AusCERT. The mailing list you are subscribed to is
maintained within your organisation, so if you do not wish to continue
receiving these bulletins you should contact your local IT manager. If
you do not know who that is, please send an email to auscert@auscert.org.au
and we will forward your request to the appropriate person.

NOTE: Third Party Rights
This security bulletin is provided as a service to AusCERT’s members. As
AusCERT did not write the document quoted above, AusCERT has had no control
over its content. The decision to follow or act on information or advice
contained in this security bulletin is the responsibility of each user or
organisation, and should be considered in accordance with your organisation’s
site policies and procedures. AusCERT takes no responsibility for consequences
which may arise from following or acting on information or advice contained in
this security bulletin.

NOTE: This is only the original release of the security bulletin. It may
not be updated when updates to the original are made. If downloading at
a later date, it is recommended that the bulletin is retrieved directly
from the author’s website to ensure that the information is still current.

Contact information for the authors of the original document is included
in the Security Bulletin above. If you have any questions or need further
information, please contact them directly.

Previous advisories and external security bulletins can be retrieved from:

https://www.auscert.org.au/bulletins/

===========================================================================
Australian Computer Emergency Response Team
The University of Queensland
Brisbane
Qld 4072

Internet Email: auscert@auscert.org.au
Facsimile: (07) 3365 7031
Telephone: (07) 3365 4417 (International: +61 7 3365 4417)
AusCERT personnel answer during Queensland business hours
which are GMT+10:00 (AEST).
On call after hours for member emergencies only.
===========================================================================
—–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—–
Comment: http://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=1967
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=/Gd6
—–END PGP SIGNATURE—–

Read More

The post ESB-2021.2345 – [Appliance] Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100: Denial of service – Remote/unauthenticated appeared first on Malware Devil.



https://malwaredevil.com/2021/07/09/esb-2021-2345-appliance-rockwell-automation-micrologix-1100-denial-of-service-remote-unauthenticated/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=esb-2021-2345-appliance-rockwell-automation-micrologix-1100-denial-of-service-remote-unauthenticated

Barbary Pirates and Russian Cybercrime

In 1801, the United States had a small Navy. Thomas Jefferson deployed almost half that Navy—three frigates and a schooner—to the Barbary C...